Skip to main content

Fixing The Infrastructure

      In my blog “Will The Real Barack Obama Please Stand Up” on February 7, I mentioned that the President does not seem to be very enthusiastic on infrastructure spending, and that he has tended to push that off on the states. I think infrastructure spending is a veritable gold mine for job creation.
      Chicago road crews are scrambling to fix 67,000 potholes a month. Communities in Pennsylvania rely on 100-year-old water pipes made of wood. Squirrels still cause widespread blackouts. The country’s 600,000 bridges, 4 million miles of roads and 30,000 wastewater plants desperately need attention. The solution isn’t patches, it’s an overhaul. [Popular Science, February, 2010.] The article also suggests some of the fixes available - some soon, some not so soon. Here are a few examples:
      A professor at the University of Michigan has developed a concrete that senses the carbon dioxide and water in small cracks, and causes a chemical reaction that repairs the crack.
      When certain toxins, lead, arsenic, anthrax and PCBs are present in water, certain non-toxic bacteria can detect their presence and emanate a phosphorescent glow. A monitoring station can measure the glow and determine precisely how much toxin is present. The system is 2 - 5 years away.
      More electrical wires can be put underground. New cables have been developed which can carry up to a quarter more current without adding any more bulky insulation.
      New flexible fiber-optic cables have been developed which keep the photons in the line no matter how much it is twisted or bent.
      Robots are being developed that use a laser to spot leaks in sewage lines.
      These are just a few of the suggestions offered that would prop up our sagging infrastructure. Even if none of them pan out, there is no question about the need to do something. And even more importantly in the present situation, repairing and updating the infrastructure by any means promises lots of jobs, jobs, jobs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes a...
The Future of Work This is for folks who don't mind stretching their imagination a bit. Let me review some of the things that are happening in today's world. A recent news article stated that in spite of the decreasing jobless rate, the number of retail jobs has been dropping rapidly. An article in Business Insider calls it a retail apocalypse. According to the article, in the retail industry, "Since October about 89,000 workers in general merchandise stores have lost their jobs, which is more than the number of people employed in the entire US coal industry." ( http://www.businessinsider.com/retail-job-losses-are-hurting-the-economy-2017-4 ). This loss is due to the rapid expansion of online merchandising. But this is only one example of the point I want to make. According to an article in Scientific American, two professors at Oxford University published a study estimating the probability that "702 occupations would soon be computerized out of exist...

It's Not Just Semantics

     It seems there are two competing definitons for the term “small business”; to no one's surprise the Democrats are using one and the Republicans are using the other. For the convenience of anyone who doesn't know which party he prefers, here are the definitions: 1.) A small business is a business which is not very large, e.g., a corner grocery, a machine shop with a couple of employees, a mom and pop enterprise, etc. Most Democrats use the term in this context. 2.) A small business is a business which operates as a pass-through tax entity, e.g., most of the businesses in def. 1.) plus most mega-farms, some manufacturing firms, and practically all high-tech and professional firms. These organizations use the individual proprietorship, partnership, S-corporation, limited-liability company (LLC), etc. tax reporting format. Under this definition the business could have anywhere from one to thousands of employees. For example, with over 163,000 employees worldwide, t...