Skip to main content

We Are All In This Together?

      Please bear with me for a little background on my main subject.
      As with most nations, the U.K. is experiencing serious problems with its financial system. For the calendar year 2009 the UK budget deficit was 11.4% of GDP, and its general government debt was 68.1% of GDP. Although the UK is not a member of the European Common Market, these ratios compare to the market’s targets of 3% and 60% respectively. As a result Queen Elizabeth II gave an austerity speech on the opening day of Parliament this past Tuesday.
      Some of the queen’s comments outlined changes to the traditional political system, e.g., a new voting system for members of the House of Commons, fewer and more "equal-sized constituencies," and the right of voters to recall elected lawmakers who are found guilty of serious wrongdoing. In the near future there will be proposals to make the House of Lords “wholly or mainly elected.”
      She also called for a ₤6 billion cut in public spending, and canceled a ₤5.1 billion plan to issue a national identity card. Caps in certain immigrant quotas, changes in the postal service and pensions, and other proposals to "restore trust in democratic institutions and rebalance the relationship between the citizen and the state," were also included in her speech.
      But the major thrust of her message was that, “The first priority is to reduce the deficit and restore economic growth.”
      The opening of parliament includes traditional ceremonies. In 1605 the Catholics attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament. To make sure it doesn’t happen again, the Yeoman of the Guard first searches the cellars of the Palace of Westminster.
      Although it has been several hundred years since a monarch faced a hostile parliament, a member of the House of Commons is taken hostage in Buckingham Palace, and wined and dined until the monarch returns safely. (In actuality he is released even before the monarch leaves for parliament.)
      After having been assured of her safety, the queen, accompanied by cannon fire and red-jacketed Yeoman on horseback, is driven in her glittering carriage to Westminster, where she dons the royal robes in preparation for the main event.
      The members of the House of Commons are summoned to attend the queen’s speech by her messenger, Black Rod. When he arrives at the House chamber, the door is slammed in his face, symbolic of the right of Commons to admit no one except the queen’s messenger. It is then reopened so that Black Rod can deliver the summons. (No monarch has entered the House of Commons since 1642.)
      The queen delivered her message seated on her throne. She wore the regal robes and the royal platinum crown, studded with some 2,000 diamonds, including the 105-carat Koh-i-Noor.
      At the conclusion of her speech, the queen confirmed that she and the Duke of Edinburgh will visit Canada in June and travel to New York to visit the United Nations in July.
      Really drives home the idea of austerity, don’t you think?
******
      In many cultures the soul left the body temporarily in sleep; if it left permanently, the body would die. Thus it was important that the soul be induced to return from any absence. In some cases dreams are considered to be actual adventures of the soul while the body is asleep, as illustrated by the following:
      The Santals, a large tribe in India, told of a man who fell asleep, and his soul, in the form of a lizard, entered a pitcher for a drink of water. While the soul was inside, the owner of the pitcher covered it; consequently, the soul could not return, and the man died. While his friends were preparing to burn the body, someone uncovered the pitcher and the soul returned to the body, which immediately revived. He said he had been down in a well to get water, but had found it hard to get out.
      Man Takes Control – The Spirit Runs Through It.

The book and/or a free look inside is available in paperback or on Kindle at Amazon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes a...
The Future of Work This is for folks who don't mind stretching their imagination a bit. Let me review some of the things that are happening in today's world. A recent news article stated that in spite of the decreasing jobless rate, the number of retail jobs has been dropping rapidly. An article in Business Insider calls it a retail apocalypse. According to the article, in the retail industry, "Since October about 89,000 workers in general merchandise stores have lost their jobs, which is more than the number of people employed in the entire US coal industry." ( http://www.businessinsider.com/retail-job-losses-are-hurting-the-economy-2017-4 ). This loss is due to the rapid expansion of online merchandising. But this is only one example of the point I want to make. According to an article in Scientific American, two professors at Oxford University published a study estimating the probability that "702 occupations would soon be computerized out of exist...

It's Not Just Semantics

     It seems there are two competing definitons for the term “small business”; to no one's surprise the Democrats are using one and the Republicans are using the other. For the convenience of anyone who doesn't know which party he prefers, here are the definitions: 1.) A small business is a business which is not very large, e.g., a corner grocery, a machine shop with a couple of employees, a mom and pop enterprise, etc. Most Democrats use the term in this context. 2.) A small business is a business which operates as a pass-through tax entity, e.g., most of the businesses in def. 1.) plus most mega-farms, some manufacturing firms, and practically all high-tech and professional firms. These organizations use the individual proprietorship, partnership, S-corporation, limited-liability company (LLC), etc. tax reporting format. Under this definition the business could have anywhere from one to thousands of employees. For example, with over 163,000 employees worldwide, t...