Skip to main content

Doctors Yesterday and Today


 While waiting for the doctor yesterday, I got to thinking about the ways in which visits to the doctor have changed over the years. I had plenty of time to think - I arrived ten minutes early to a crowded waiting room, and figured I would be there for quite a while.
Thirty-five minutes after my appointed time my name was called, and I was taken to an examination room. “Not too bad,” I thought. Thirty-five minutes after that the doctor showed up! “Not too good,” I thought, “but not unusual today, particularly for a specialist.”
Now to be honest, during the 1940s and 1950s there was a local surgeon with a similar arrangement. You almost always arrived to a waiting room with 20 people ahead of you. When your name finally was called you were ushered into another waiting room filled with the same 20 people! It was usually about a 30 minute wait after you finally arrived in the examining room. But this was very unusual for the time.
Until the 1960s, when one needed to see one's family doctor, one dropped into his office during “visiting hours,” usually two to four in the afternoon and seven to nine in the evening (except for Thursdays). If one were too ill to go to the office, one called him and he came to the house. I believe the cost was two dollars for an office visit and five dollars for a house call. You remember house calls.
At one time one of my sons was stung by a bee, and we discovered he was subject to anaphylactic shock! The treatment consisted of an injection of serum weekly for ten weeks. The doctor kept the serum in his refrigerator, and each week he gave my son his shot for a dollar!
Today if one needs to see the family practitioner, it requires an appointment. The wait is usually not more than ten or fifteen minutes, but the fee, your co-payment plus the insurance company payment, can run upwards of $70 for a ten minute visit. And you are lucky if you get ten minutes of his time, particularly if he is a member of a family group.
In the past, the family doctor performed minor surgery in his office, but not anymore. Unless your problem is very minor, he will probably send you to a specialist.
In 1949 I had a family doctor remove a marble-sized cyst from my wrist in his office. It cost me $35. Today's specialist would probably do the same job in a surgery center for several thousand dollars.
Yesterday the doctor prescribed cortisone shots for my knees,but he didn't actually administer the shots – he had his nurse do it. When I questioned it, she said the doctors don't do the on-hands work; that's the nurse's job. Well, that's probably several hundred dollars cheaper than if he did it.
How times have changed.

******
My books, “There Are Only Seven Jokes” and “The Spirit Runs Through It” are available in paperback, or at the Kindle Store.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes a...
The Future of Work This is for folks who don't mind stretching their imagination a bit. Let me review some of the things that are happening in today's world. A recent news article stated that in spite of the decreasing jobless rate, the number of retail jobs has been dropping rapidly. An article in Business Insider calls it a retail apocalypse. According to the article, in the retail industry, "Since October about 89,000 workers in general merchandise stores have lost their jobs, which is more than the number of people employed in the entire US coal industry." ( http://www.businessinsider.com/retail-job-losses-are-hurting-the-economy-2017-4 ). This loss is due to the rapid expansion of online merchandising. But this is only one example of the point I want to make. According to an article in Scientific American, two professors at Oxford University published a study estimating the probability that "702 occupations would soon be computerized out of exist...

It's Not Just Semantics

     It seems there are two competing definitons for the term “small business”; to no one's surprise the Democrats are using one and the Republicans are using the other. For the convenience of anyone who doesn't know which party he prefers, here are the definitions: 1.) A small business is a business which is not very large, e.g., a corner grocery, a machine shop with a couple of employees, a mom and pop enterprise, etc. Most Democrats use the term in this context. 2.) A small business is a business which operates as a pass-through tax entity, e.g., most of the businesses in def. 1.) plus most mega-farms, some manufacturing firms, and practically all high-tech and professional firms. These organizations use the individual proprietorship, partnership, S-corporation, limited-liability company (LLC), etc. tax reporting format. Under this definition the business could have anywhere from one to thousands of employees. For example, with over 163,000 employees worldwide, t...