Skip to main content

Warning from a Wise Man



Dwight Eisenhower was the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe during WWII. After the war he became the 34th President of the United States (1953 – 1961). His words are especially relevant in today’s political climate:
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or our democratic process. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.”
Apparently the citizenry has been neither alert nor knowledgeable. The Pentagon has called “unnecessary and unaffordable” the following five projects in Ohio alone:

1.   Upgrades to the M1 Abrams tank. The Pentagon wants to suspend $3B in upgrades until a new version, scheduled for 2017, is ready. Legislators say the action would cost 800 jobs in Lima, Ohio, and are budgeting over $250M to keep the plant going.
2.   Congress put $278M into the Global Hawk Block 30 Drone program. The Pentagon says the U2 spy plane can do the job and save $2.5B by 2017.
3.   The Pentagon says the C-27J Spartan cargo plane is not needed, and discontinuing its use would save $400M by 2017. Congress, in its infinite wisdom(?)  budgeted funds to keep ‘em flying.
4.   The Pentagon wants to cut 5,100 positions from the Air National Guard, thereby saving $300M next year. Ohio’s representatives are fighting the proposal.
5.   The Pentagon says that a missile defense system to protect the east coast from Iran and other highly sophisticated air attack forces is unnecessary, but Congress has budgeted $100M to fund the project for next year. It is projected that the cost could rise to $3.6B by 2017.

One has only to Google “Unwanted Military Projects” to find examples of ships, planes, tanks and other pork which the Pentagon considers unnecessary. Under sequestration, these projects must be funded by money taken from projects which the Pentagon considers to be essential.
Instead of getting Congressional pork under control, we are closing schools, gutting programs that feed hungry kids, letting our infrastructure deteriorate and forcing seniors to eat dog food.
Here is another quote from President Eisenhower: “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed . . . The cost of one medium heavy  bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than thirty cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter with a half-million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people . . . This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.”
Although the costs mentioned by Eisenhower have changed since he spoke over 50 years ago, the words have never been more relevant than they are today. It raises a question which has often been asked in recent years: “Why can we not afford to feed our own hungry people, but we can always afford another war?”
 ******

My books, “There Are Only Seven Jokes” and “The Spirit Runs Through It” are available in paperback or Kindle at Amazon.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes a...
The Future of Work This is for folks who don't mind stretching their imagination a bit. Let me review some of the things that are happening in today's world. A recent news article stated that in spite of the decreasing jobless rate, the number of retail jobs has been dropping rapidly. An article in Business Insider calls it a retail apocalypse. According to the article, in the retail industry, "Since October about 89,000 workers in general merchandise stores have lost their jobs, which is more than the number of people employed in the entire US coal industry." ( http://www.businessinsider.com/retail-job-losses-are-hurting-the-economy-2017-4 ). This loss is due to the rapid expansion of online merchandising. But this is only one example of the point I want to make. According to an article in Scientific American, two professors at Oxford University published a study estimating the probability that "702 occupations would soon be computerized out of exist...

Men Never Outgrow Their Love of Toys

     I guess I am no different from most other men – I like gadgets. I know there are some wonderful toys that I am missing, but if I am sure I have no use for an iPhone, xBox, and the like, I don't buy them. And I decided that even though the ultimate toy, my car, is 10 model years old, it's in good shape, and I don't need a new one. However, we are driving from Pennsylvania to Texas next week, so I did spring for a GPS, and it's really fascinating.      I downloaded the owner's manual and after perusing it, sort of (owners' manuals are to use when you can't figure it out otherwise), I entered my home address into the instrument. I had to test that, so I drove a couple of miles, turned around, and hit the “Home” button.      I was a bit disappointed in the results: it got me home OK, but it didn't take the shortcuts I would have taken. It did keep saying “recalculating” a few times, and when I got within a block or two of t...