Skip to main content

Why Has My Social Security Check Not Increased Along With Everything Else?

      In spite of the fact that we have been in a recession since early in 2008, it is apparent that the cost-of-living for post-youths has been increasing over this period. So why is my Social Security check less this year than it was last year?
      Actually, the amount received for Social Security has not changed because of the way the Social Security Administration computes it, but the deduction for Medicare has increased.
      In order to measure general price increases, the Bureau of Labor Statistics constructs an imaginary "market basket" of goods that an average family needs to lead an average life. The market basket includes specific items relating to housing, food, transportation, medical care (not including health care premiums paid by the employer), clothing, entertainment, education and communication. Currently, there are approximately 80,000 items in the "basket."
      The final price is actually a weighted sum, the weights reflecting the proportion that the average family spends on various categories and population of the geographic area.
      The CPI is the index number created from the "price" of the entire market basket. Currently, the base "year" for the CPI is 1982-84. This means that the average of the CPI over the three years 1982, 1983, and 1984 is set equal to 100.
      The Bureau of Labor Statistics actually publishes two CPI's, the CPI-U (All Urban Consumers) and the CPI-W (Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers). For calculating Social Security benefit payments, the Social Security Administration uses the CPI-W, which is based on the expenditures of urban households more than half of whose income comes from clerical or wage occupations. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that it represents about 32% of the US population.
      The CPI completely ignores important changes in taxes, health care other than out-of-pocket costs, water and air quality, crime levels, consumer safety, and educational quality.
      It is important to note that the CPI-W is based on costs of working households. Costs of retired persons normally differ substantially from those of working people. Studies indicate that seniors spend more on health care (no surprise there), and housing (primarily due to the cost of retirement facilities). Both of these categories have experienced higher than average inflation rates.
      Some years ago the Federal Reserve Bank conducted a study (CPI-E) of the relative weighting of the various categories. The following table lists their findings:


Category                                    CPI-W                CPI-E
Food                                          16.30                  14.32
Housing                                     39.60                   45.94
Apparel                                      4.90                      2.77
Transportation                        17.60                  13.81
Medical care                              5.60                   10.24
Recreation                                  6.10                     4.36
Education                                   5.50                     2.98
Other                                         4.30                     5.59

      The study indicated that the CPI-E averaged 3.8% higher than the CPI-W. For the years 1984 – 2001, if the CPI-E had been used to calculate benefits, seniors would have received an average of $408 more per year.
      Because medical expenses and housing (for seniors) have not seen the mitigating effects of the 2008 recession, actual cost-of-living has gone up for seniors. But because they are substantially underweighted in the formula, Social Security benefits have not kept pace.
      Contact your representative about using the CPI-E for calculating benefits.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes a...
The Future of Work This is for folks who don't mind stretching their imagination a bit. Let me review some of the things that are happening in today's world. A recent news article stated that in spite of the decreasing jobless rate, the number of retail jobs has been dropping rapidly. An article in Business Insider calls it a retail apocalypse. According to the article, in the retail industry, "Since October about 89,000 workers in general merchandise stores have lost their jobs, which is more than the number of people employed in the entire US coal industry." ( http://www.businessinsider.com/retail-job-losses-are-hurting-the-economy-2017-4 ). This loss is due to the rapid expansion of online merchandising. But this is only one example of the point I want to make. According to an article in Scientific American, two professors at Oxford University published a study estimating the probability that "702 occupations would soon be computerized out of exist...

Men Never Outgrow Their Love of Toys

     I guess I am no different from most other men – I like gadgets. I know there are some wonderful toys that I am missing, but if I am sure I have no use for an iPhone, xBox, and the like, I don't buy them. And I decided that even though the ultimate toy, my car, is 10 model years old, it's in good shape, and I don't need a new one. However, we are driving from Pennsylvania to Texas next week, so I did spring for a GPS, and it's really fascinating.      I downloaded the owner's manual and after perusing it, sort of (owners' manuals are to use when you can't figure it out otherwise), I entered my home address into the instrument. I had to test that, so I drove a couple of miles, turned around, and hit the “Home” button.      I was a bit disappointed in the results: it got me home OK, but it didn't take the shortcuts I would have taken. It did keep saying “recalculating” a few times, and when I got within a block or two of t...