Skip to main content

Why Has My Social Security Check Not Increased Along With Everything Else?

      In spite of the fact that we have been in a recession since early in 2008, it is apparent that the cost-of-living for post-youths has been increasing over this period. So why is my Social Security check less this year than it was last year?
      Actually, the amount received for Social Security has not changed because of the way the Social Security Administration computes it, but the deduction for Medicare has increased.
      In order to measure general price increases, the Bureau of Labor Statistics constructs an imaginary "market basket" of goods that an average family needs to lead an average life. The market basket includes specific items relating to housing, food, transportation, medical care (not including health care premiums paid by the employer), clothing, entertainment, education and communication. Currently, there are approximately 80,000 items in the "basket."
      The final price is actually a weighted sum, the weights reflecting the proportion that the average family spends on various categories and population of the geographic area.
      The CPI is the index number created from the "price" of the entire market basket. Currently, the base "year" for the CPI is 1982-84. This means that the average of the CPI over the three years 1982, 1983, and 1984 is set equal to 100.
      The Bureau of Labor Statistics actually publishes two CPI's, the CPI-U (All Urban Consumers) and the CPI-W (Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers). For calculating Social Security benefit payments, the Social Security Administration uses the CPI-W, which is based on the expenditures of urban households more than half of whose income comes from clerical or wage occupations. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that it represents about 32% of the US population.
      The CPI completely ignores important changes in taxes, health care other than out-of-pocket costs, water and air quality, crime levels, consumer safety, and educational quality.
      It is important to note that the CPI-W is based on costs of working households. Costs of retired persons normally differ substantially from those of working people. Studies indicate that seniors spend more on health care (no surprise there), and housing (primarily due to the cost of retirement facilities). Both of these categories have experienced higher than average inflation rates.
      Some years ago the Federal Reserve Bank conducted a study (CPI-E) of the relative weighting of the various categories. The following table lists their findings:


Category                                    CPI-W                CPI-E
Food                                          16.30                  14.32
Housing                                     39.60                   45.94
Apparel                                      4.90                      2.77
Transportation                        17.60                  13.81
Medical care                              5.60                   10.24
Recreation                                  6.10                     4.36
Education                                   5.50                     2.98
Other                                         4.30                     5.59

      The study indicated that the CPI-E averaged 3.8% higher than the CPI-W. For the years 1984 – 2001, if the CPI-E had been used to calculate benefits, seniors would have received an average of $408 more per year.
      Because medical expenses and housing (for seniors) have not seen the mitigating effects of the 2008 recession, actual cost-of-living has gone up for seniors. But because they are substantially underweighted in the formula, Social Security benefits have not kept pace.
      Contact your representative about using the CPI-E for calculating benefits.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes appearing therein are so out-of-date that modern readers wouldn’t even understand them. For example,

By Today’s Standards Many of my Teachers Would be in Jail

I started school in a two-room building: grades 1 to 4 in one room; grades 5 to 8 in the other. One teacher in each room taught all four grades. I don’t remember first grade very well – the teacher left at the end of the year. I am pretty sure it was not my fault. Now keep in mind that reading the Bible every morning was the standard for all grades at that time. But my teacher in grades two to four went a little above and beyond the normal practice. As a member of a “plain” sect, she considered it her duty to lead the little heathens to Christianity. She offered a free Bible to all students who managed to memorize 20 verses. I memorized my verses – “Jesus saves” was my favorite because it was the shortest – and got my Bible with my twenty underlined in red. That would be illegal today (not the underlining), and rightly so. Teachers may not teach religion, although contrary to what many folks seem to think, students may bring their Bibles to school, read them, and pray their
The National Anthem I have a somewhat minor pet peeve. I say minor because in the grand scheme of things neither I nor society will do anything substantive about it, so my best bet is probably to suck it up and move on. Perhaps after writing about it I can lay it to rest. It came up recently while I was working out at our Wellness Center. A program on television was playing America The Beautiful , and I remarked to a lady I have known for 40 years that I thought that should be the National Anthem instead of The Star Spangled Banner. She replied, rather huffily, I thought, “Some people think God Bless America should be the national anthem.” At that point I decided, wisely, I think, to back off before an argument sprang up. Now I realize that The Star Spangled Banner is a very nice, patriotic song, but an anthem it is not. According to Wikipedia, “ An anthem is a  musical composition  of celebration, usually used as a symbol for a distinct group, particularly the  nationa