Skip to main content

A Radical Idea for the Congress



In defiance of a warning from President Obama not to use poison gas against its own citizens, the Syrian government has reputedly done so. Now the President must take some action or else the worldwide faith in the U.S. Government’s word will be severely eroded. He is seeking approval from Congress to initiate a “limited” military strike, and this presents a serious dilemma for Congresspersons.
The Republicans operate under a “go to war first, ask questions later” principle a la George Bush and the Iraq war. But they are also beholden to the tea party, hence the “If Obama is for it, we’re against it” rule.
The Democrats want to support their President, but they also remember that he was the anti-war activist who called the U.S. Government “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world,” which turned out to be a winning campaign strategy. In addition, some of the rebels are sympathetic to al Qaida, which raises the question whether the replacement government would be any better than the current regime. And they also fear the “slippery slope” possibility.
What to do, what to do?
Let’s take a look at the Constitution for a possible solution. The Preamble states that “We the People of the United States . . . establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” Article I, Section 2 states “The House of Representatives shall be . . . chosen every second year by the people of the several states.” Amendment XVII states that “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, elected by the people thereof.”
I could find no reference anywhere in the document which implies that Congresspersons answer to a political party, a tea party, a president, or any other institution. Neither could I find anything which indicates that the United States must act as the policeman for the world.
So I suggest that you try something new: represent your constituents, who, according to all polls, are opposed to intervention in the affairs of Syria. It’s your job. You are not smarter than they are; after all, the Constitution was created by the People, not by the Congress.
 ******

My books, “There Are Only Seven Jokes” and “The Spirit Runs Through It” are available in paperback or Kindle at Amazon.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes appearing therein are so out-of-date that modern readers wouldn’t even understand them. For example,

By Today’s Standards Many of my Teachers Would be in Jail

I started school in a two-room building: grades 1 to 4 in one room; grades 5 to 8 in the other. One teacher in each room taught all four grades. I don’t remember first grade very well – the teacher left at the end of the year. I am pretty sure it was not my fault. Now keep in mind that reading the Bible every morning was the standard for all grades at that time. But my teacher in grades two to four went a little above and beyond the normal practice. As a member of a “plain” sect, she considered it her duty to lead the little heathens to Christianity. She offered a free Bible to all students who managed to memorize 20 verses. I memorized my verses – “Jesus saves” was my favorite because it was the shortest – and got my Bible with my twenty underlined in red. That would be illegal today (not the underlining), and rightly so. Teachers may not teach religion, although contrary to what many folks seem to think, students may bring their Bibles to school, read them, and pray their
The National Anthem I have a somewhat minor pet peeve. I say minor because in the grand scheme of things neither I nor society will do anything substantive about it, so my best bet is probably to suck it up and move on. Perhaps after writing about it I can lay it to rest. It came up recently while I was working out at our Wellness Center. A program on television was playing America The Beautiful , and I remarked to a lady I have known for 40 years that I thought that should be the National Anthem instead of The Star Spangled Banner. She replied, rather huffily, I thought, “Some people think God Bless America should be the national anthem.” At that point I decided, wisely, I think, to back off before an argument sprang up. Now I realize that The Star Spangled Banner is a very nice, patriotic song, but an anthem it is not. According to Wikipedia, “ An anthem is a  musical composition  of celebration, usually used as a symbol for a distinct group, particularly the  nationa