That's
a question that needs an answer, George, so I decided to look it up.
And the answer is . . . he's just a guy who is fixated on one thing
and one thing only. As he puts it, “My
goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it
down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub.” In other
words, he wants to eliminate government. Period.
One
of the ways he hopes to accomplish his goal is through his Taxpayer
Protection Pledge,
in which the
pledger promises to "oppose any and all efforts to increase the
marginal income tax rate for individuals and business; and to oppose
any net reduction or elimination of deductions and credits, unless
matched dollar for dollar by further reducing tax rates."
In
1985 Norquist founded the Americans
For Tax Reform (ATR),which
he claims was in response to a request by President Reagan. Although
the stated primary policy goal of ATR is to reduce government
revenues as a percentage of the GDP, ATR also states that it "opposes
all tax increases as a matter of principle." As stated by a
Reagan staffer, the idea is to “starve the beast.” According to
an ATR spokesman, as of 6 July 2012, a total of 539 incumbent
lawmakers and candidates have signed the pledge.
Officially
Norquist is a lobbyist for ATR, so why does he exercise such a strong
influence over Republican Congressmen? Because of the principles he
advocates, he is loudly singing the same song as the “tea party,”
the all-powerful NRA, the Conservative Caucus and other far-right
causes.
The
fallacy of the “no-government” group is that there are some
activities that only government can perform efficiently. Imagine how
well 50 individual state militias would fare against almost any invader. Would
we really need several competing highways between Washington, D.C.
and Philadelphia? What organization would or could finance basic science research? If there were no educational requirements, would
there be communities that decided that public schools were a waste of
money? Whose private money would be good nationwide? If banks were
unrestricted, what sort of mechanism would be set up to prevent
another great depression? (Admittedly, the current mechanism is not
operating 100% efficiently, but it beats nothing.) But you get the
idea.
As
G.H.W. Bush says, conditions change. If your landlord decided to
double your rent, would you give up food, or would you look for some
way to increase your income?
A
nation after government elimination does not enjoy freedom – it
suffers chaos.
******
My books, “There
Are Only Seven Jokes” and “The Spirit Runs Through It” are
available in paperback or Kindle at Amazon.
Comments
Post a Comment