Skip to main content

Dark Science

      The theory that light consists of waves was proposed as early as the last half of the 17th century, and was almost universally accepted until the late 19th century. However, the theory did pose a significant problem.
      It was thought that waves always were propagated through some kind of medium. For example, water waves needed water to spread and sound waves needed air. But how could light waves propagate through empty space? How did light from the sun travel through the vacuum of space to arrive on earth?
      So scientists came up with the idea of the “luminiferous aether,” an invisible medium which pervaded space. This idea held sway until 1887, when Albert Michelson and Edward Morley performed their ground-breaking experiment which proved that the luminiferous aether did not exist. Although in some experiments light appeared to be a wave, it did not require a propagating medium.
      In the waning years of the 20th century, mother nature presented a similar conundrum. Based upon the effect of gravity upon matter, cosmologists have calculated the total mass/energy of the universe. However, other observations suggest that visible matter, galaxies, gas, dust, etc., accounts for between 4% and 5% of the total. It is as if you put sugar on the scales for a total of 10 pounds, but when you weigh it by the ounce, you have only eight ounces!
      Shades of the 19th century – scientists are speculating that the difference is due to “dark” matter and energy. It is invisible just as was the luminiferous aether! Imagine 8-1/2 pounds of invisible sugar on your scales!
      Which brings me to the Large Hadron Collider: a huge tunnel 17 miles in circumference and almost 600 feet beneath the border between France and Switzerland. Among other things, scientists hope that this 16 billion dollar experiment will do for dark matter what the Michelson-Morley experiment did in 1887: prove or disprove its existence.
      Invisible luminiferous aether/invisible dark matter. History repeats itself. Stay tuned.
*********
      Similar to the invisible change in individuals, there is a continuous change in the unseen culture which lies beneath each society. New fads, morals, systems, governments, commerce, architecture, etc. come and go. In the early 1700s most colonists believed in the divine right of kings to govern; today’s Americans believe in democracy and individual freedom. In the 21st century medical science is far more popular as a cure for illness than the blood-letting of the 18th century. Some cultures believed that a certain dance would cause rain to fall; others believed that human sacrifice would relieve drought.
      Foreword – The Spirit Runs Through It.

      To read more excerpts from the book, click here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes appearing therein are so out-of-date that modern readers wouldn’t even understand them. For example,

By Today’s Standards Many of my Teachers Would be in Jail

I started school in a two-room building: grades 1 to 4 in one room; grades 5 to 8 in the other. One teacher in each room taught all four grades. I don’t remember first grade very well – the teacher left at the end of the year. I am pretty sure it was not my fault. Now keep in mind that reading the Bible every morning was the standard for all grades at that time. But my teacher in grades two to four went a little above and beyond the normal practice. As a member of a “plain” sect, she considered it her duty to lead the little heathens to Christianity. She offered a free Bible to all students who managed to memorize 20 verses. I memorized my verses – “Jesus saves” was my favorite because it was the shortest – and got my Bible with my twenty underlined in red. That would be illegal today (not the underlining), and rightly so. Teachers may not teach religion, although contrary to what many folks seem to think, students may bring their Bibles to school, read them, and pray their
The National Anthem I have a somewhat minor pet peeve. I say minor because in the grand scheme of things neither I nor society will do anything substantive about it, so my best bet is probably to suck it up and move on. Perhaps after writing about it I can lay it to rest. It came up recently while I was working out at our Wellness Center. A program on television was playing America The Beautiful , and I remarked to a lady I have known for 40 years that I thought that should be the National Anthem instead of The Star Spangled Banner. She replied, rather huffily, I thought, “Some people think God Bless America should be the national anthem.” At that point I decided, wisely, I think, to back off before an argument sprang up. Now I realize that The Star Spangled Banner is a very nice, patriotic song, but an anthem it is not. According to Wikipedia, “ An anthem is a  musical composition  of celebration, usually used as a symbol for a distinct group, particularly the  nationa