Skip to main content

Your Representative Wants To Hear From You

About a month ago the administrator of Luther Acres asked the residents to contact their political representatives and ask them not to drop the CLASS provision, which provides partial funding for nursing homes, from the annual budget. So I contacted my state and federal reps by telephone where possible. My rep in Congress, Joe Pitts, was not available, so I e-mailed him.

Today I received a reply. It was a thank you note for contacting him about my concern for the "end-of-life provisions in President Obama’s healthcare proposal," (Huh?) which I never mentioned in my email. His response consisted of a fairly long document concerning several of the provisions in the Obama plan.

But the main portion of the letter was Just-Say-No-Joe’s objection to the end-of-life consultations included in the proposed bill. The gist of his objection is that he is afraid the elderly will be pressured into signing directives they would not otherwise sign.

In addition, Joe is upset because nowhere in the bill is there a prohibition on counseling about the supposed benefits of killing oneself.

Now as I understand it, the idea is for elderly individuals to consult with their health professional (doctor) in order to ascertain their options regarding their last days. In other contexts Joe has stated that government bureaucrats should never come between the patient and his or her doctor. Apparently that applies only as long as the discussion does not go in any direction that Joe doesn’t approve of.

The point is, in all this response, there was not one mention of CLASS, budget or nursing homes! The moral of this story is: Let your representatives know your feelings on the issues – they really welcome your input(?)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes appearing therein are so out-of-date that modern readers wouldn’t even understand them. For example,

By Today’s Standards Many of my Teachers Would be in Jail

I started school in a two-room building: grades 1 to 4 in one room; grades 5 to 8 in the other. One teacher in each room taught all four grades. I don’t remember first grade very well – the teacher left at the end of the year. I am pretty sure it was not my fault. Now keep in mind that reading the Bible every morning was the standard for all grades at that time. But my teacher in grades two to four went a little above and beyond the normal practice. As a member of a “plain” sect, she considered it her duty to lead the little heathens to Christianity. She offered a free Bible to all students who managed to memorize 20 verses. I memorized my verses – “Jesus saves” was my favorite because it was the shortest – and got my Bible with my twenty underlined in red. That would be illegal today (not the underlining), and rightly so. Teachers may not teach religion, although contrary to what many folks seem to think, students may bring their Bibles to school, read them, and pray their
The National Anthem I have a somewhat minor pet peeve. I say minor because in the grand scheme of things neither I nor society will do anything substantive about it, so my best bet is probably to suck it up and move on. Perhaps after writing about it I can lay it to rest. It came up recently while I was working out at our Wellness Center. A program on television was playing America The Beautiful , and I remarked to a lady I have known for 40 years that I thought that should be the National Anthem instead of The Star Spangled Banner. She replied, rather huffily, I thought, “Some people think God Bless America should be the national anthem.” At that point I decided, wisely, I think, to back off before an argument sprang up. Now I realize that The Star Spangled Banner is a very nice, patriotic song, but an anthem it is not. According to Wikipedia, “ An anthem is a  musical composition  of celebration, usually used as a symbol for a distinct group, particularly the  nationa