Skip to main content

A Look At Libertarianism

      Because of the nomination of Dr. Rand Paul to be the Republican candidate for Senator from Kentucky, I have decided to take a closer look at Libertarianism. I must admit that on first glance it sounds appealing.
      According to the Libertarian Party’s web site, “Libertarians strongly oppose any government interfering in their personal, family and business decisions. Essentially, we believe all Americans should be free to live their lives and pursue their interests as they see fit as long as they do not harm one another. In a nutshell, we are advocates for a smaller government, lower taxes and more freedom.”
      According to Libertarianism: A Primer by David Boaz, “Libertarians defend each person's right to life, liberty, and property-rights that people have naturally, before governments are created. In the libertarian view, all human relationships should be voluntary; the only actions that should be forbidden by law are those that involve the initiation of force against those who have not themselves used force - actions like murder, rape, robbery, kidnapping, and fraud.”
      Generally libertarians also oppose any form of taxation or interference in the economic system.
      As near as I can tell, the role of government in a Libertarian society would be that of building highways, maintaining the Armed Forces, law enforcement, etc., but that brings up a few problems.
      First of all, it takes money, and government money comes from taxes of some kind. Second, who would decide where the highways should go? How would the necessary land be obtained? Or would highways be built by private enterprise? This is unclear in libertarian writings.
      Things like helping the poor or those without any property-rights would be on a voluntary basis. Although barring certain classes of people from your business premises would be allowed, no business-person would do so because he would be losing not only the business of the forbidden class, but also the business of those people who might not think it a responsible thing to do.
      But suppose all these problems could be solved, such a Libertarian Utopia would still be subject to the one problem faced by all Utopias: it would be inhabited by human beings. And human beings are subject to the seven deadly sins: lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy and pride.
      Let’s face it; in the beginning the United States came pretty close to being such a society. Fortunately, the Founding Fathers came along and wrote the Constitution with its wonderful Preamble, mostly ignored in the Libertarian philosophy: We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
      When the great boxer, Joe Louis, was asked about his decision to enlist in the racially-segregated Army in 1942, he replied, "Lots of things wrong with America, but Hitler ain't going to fix them."
      Neither is Libertarianism.
******
      Working with language and logic, the Spirit could rearrange, combine, and transform the vast number of memories in the human brain to create wholly new solutions (and problems). The speed of creativity was increased by many orders of magnitude. Insights became possible. For the first time, a man could run through the streets screaming, “Eureka, I have found it.” He could also say, “If you don’t bow down before my god, I will kill you.”
      The Growth of Language – The Spirit Runs Through It.

The book and/or a free look inside is available in paperback or on Kindle at Amazon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes appearing therein are so out-of-date that modern readers wouldn’t even understand them. For example,

By Today’s Standards Many of my Teachers Would be in Jail

I started school in a two-room building: grades 1 to 4 in one room; grades 5 to 8 in the other. One teacher in each room taught all four grades. I don’t remember first grade very well – the teacher left at the end of the year. I am pretty sure it was not my fault. Now keep in mind that reading the Bible every morning was the standard for all grades at that time. But my teacher in grades two to four went a little above and beyond the normal practice. As a member of a “plain” sect, she considered it her duty to lead the little heathens to Christianity. She offered a free Bible to all students who managed to memorize 20 verses. I memorized my verses – “Jesus saves” was my favorite because it was the shortest – and got my Bible with my twenty underlined in red. That would be illegal today (not the underlining), and rightly so. Teachers may not teach religion, although contrary to what many folks seem to think, students may bring their Bibles to school, read them, and pray their
The National Anthem I have a somewhat minor pet peeve. I say minor because in the grand scheme of things neither I nor society will do anything substantive about it, so my best bet is probably to suck it up and move on. Perhaps after writing about it I can lay it to rest. It came up recently while I was working out at our Wellness Center. A program on television was playing America The Beautiful , and I remarked to a lady I have known for 40 years that I thought that should be the National Anthem instead of The Star Spangled Banner. She replied, rather huffily, I thought, “Some people think God Bless America should be the national anthem.” At that point I decided, wisely, I think, to back off before an argument sprang up. Now I realize that The Star Spangled Banner is a very nice, patriotic song, but an anthem it is not. According to Wikipedia, “ An anthem is a  musical composition  of celebration, usually used as a symbol for a distinct group, particularly the  nationa