Skip to main content

President Obama's Supreme Court Nominee

      President Obama has nominated his second Supreme Court Justice, Elena Kagan. Already a minor feeding frenzy has started. If she has ever had so much as a traffic ticket it will come out in the next few weeks. And like living in a small town, if they can’t find anything bad to say about her, they’ll make something up.
      Since she has never had judicial experience, there is no way to look back and evaluate her decisions, however, as the dean of Harvard Law School, she has published enough articles so that one can get some idea of her approach to the law.
      But what she has written has already taken second place to what people prefer to believe she has said. And to make matters even more confusing, as part of her previous positions as counsel to President Clinton, and Solicitor General for President Obama, she has had to defend some positions that do not necessarily agree with her written positions.
      For example, on a major decision handed down this past January, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, she argued that the government may prohibit corporations and unions from using their general treasury funds to make independent expenditures for speech that is an “electioneering communication” or for speech that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a candidate. The Supreme Court struck down the law.
      Her writings indicate that she is a determined believer in free speech, thus it would seem that the job required her to argue for a cause which is contrary to her private belief. And I understand that – it is what attorneys do.
      In spite of the fact that she has been nominated by a Democrat, a group of conservative attorneys has come out in support of her. "She has had a remarkable and truly unusual record of reaching out across ideological divides," said Michael McConnell, a former federal appeals court judge who was nominated by President George W. Bush.
      But in spite of any conservative support, Rush Limbaugh, not unexpectedly, claims she is passionate about socialism. He fully expects her to continue to advance President Obama’s socialist programs. Freedom is at stake, although to this point I haven’t been able to put my finger on any freedoms we have lost.
      Freedom of speech? No problem. Freedom to assemble? Untouched. Freedom to worship or not worship as we please? Intact. Freedom to travel from state to state? Ok, unless you have a Hispanic look about you and are traveling to Arizona. (I hate to see this, but a similar bill has been introduced in the Pennsylvania Legislature. Hopefully saner heads will prevail.)
      But I have saved the best accusation for last. This past week the prestigious Wall Street Journal printed a 17 year old picture of Ms. Kagan at bat in a softball game, along with a two line caption which raised a question as to her sexuality. The New York Post followed a day later, with the headline, "Does this photo suggest high court nominee Elena Kagan is a lesbian?"
      Blogger Michael Wolff, followed up with, "To say the obvious: it's the hair. She sure looks gay." I looked at the picture, and it sure looks as if seventeen years ago she participated in a softball game!
      But they couldn’t fool Rush. He decided the whole gay imbroglio was originated by the Democrats so that people would not notice Kagan’s real “passion”: socialism.
      For the next few weeks there are two sure bets: 1.) Ms. Kagan is not going to say anything revealing about her views on today’s hot topics, and 2.) The Republicans are going to be turning over every rock that they suspect hides dirt.
      Oh, and one more thing: After all the posturing, she will be approved.
******
      The expansion of the memory and the computing ability of the human brain were absolute prerequisites to the development of language. Without the brain one could remember neither the words, nor their connections to the outside world. And without access to the memories of the vast number of events and situations stored in the human brain, there would be no way of creating solutions to the problems faced by the early humans. Mankind would be no better off than other animals.
      The Growth Of Language – The Spirit Runs Through It.

The book and/or a free look inside is available in paperback or on Kindle at Amazon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes appearing therein are so out-of-date that modern readers wouldn’t even understand them. For example,

By Today’s Standards Many of my Teachers Would be in Jail

I started school in a two-room building: grades 1 to 4 in one room; grades 5 to 8 in the other. One teacher in each room taught all four grades. I don’t remember first grade very well – the teacher left at the end of the year. I am pretty sure it was not my fault. Now keep in mind that reading the Bible every morning was the standard for all grades at that time. But my teacher in grades two to four went a little above and beyond the normal practice. As a member of a “plain” sect, she considered it her duty to lead the little heathens to Christianity. She offered a free Bible to all students who managed to memorize 20 verses. I memorized my verses – “Jesus saves” was my favorite because it was the shortest – and got my Bible with my twenty underlined in red. That would be illegal today (not the underlining), and rightly so. Teachers may not teach religion, although contrary to what many folks seem to think, students may bring their Bibles to school, read them, and pray their
The National Anthem I have a somewhat minor pet peeve. I say minor because in the grand scheme of things neither I nor society will do anything substantive about it, so my best bet is probably to suck it up and move on. Perhaps after writing about it I can lay it to rest. It came up recently while I was working out at our Wellness Center. A program on television was playing America The Beautiful , and I remarked to a lady I have known for 40 years that I thought that should be the National Anthem instead of The Star Spangled Banner. She replied, rather huffily, I thought, “Some people think God Bless America should be the national anthem.” At that point I decided, wisely, I think, to back off before an argument sprang up. Now I realize that The Star Spangled Banner is a very nice, patriotic song, but an anthem it is not. According to Wikipedia, “ An anthem is a  musical composition  of celebration, usually used as a symbol for a distinct group, particularly the  nationa