Skip to main content

We Are All In This Together?

      Please bear with me for a little background on my main subject.
      As with most nations, the U.K. is experiencing serious problems with its financial system. For the calendar year 2009 the UK budget deficit was 11.4% of GDP, and its general government debt was 68.1% of GDP. Although the UK is not a member of the European Common Market, these ratios compare to the market’s targets of 3% and 60% respectively. As a result Queen Elizabeth II gave an austerity speech on the opening day of Parliament this past Tuesday.
      Some of the queen’s comments outlined changes to the traditional political system, e.g., a new voting system for members of the House of Commons, fewer and more "equal-sized constituencies," and the right of voters to recall elected lawmakers who are found guilty of serious wrongdoing. In the near future there will be proposals to make the House of Lords “wholly or mainly elected.”
      She also called for a ₤6 billion cut in public spending, and canceled a ₤5.1 billion plan to issue a national identity card. Caps in certain immigrant quotas, changes in the postal service and pensions, and other proposals to "restore trust in democratic institutions and rebalance the relationship between the citizen and the state," were also included in her speech.
      But the major thrust of her message was that, “The first priority is to reduce the deficit and restore economic growth.”
      The opening of parliament includes traditional ceremonies. In 1605 the Catholics attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament. To make sure it doesn’t happen again, the Yeoman of the Guard first searches the cellars of the Palace of Westminster.
      Although it has been several hundred years since a monarch faced a hostile parliament, a member of the House of Commons is taken hostage in Buckingham Palace, and wined and dined until the monarch returns safely. (In actuality he is released even before the monarch leaves for parliament.)
      After having been assured of her safety, the queen, accompanied by cannon fire and red-jacketed Yeoman on horseback, is driven in her glittering carriage to Westminster, where she dons the royal robes in preparation for the main event.
      The members of the House of Commons are summoned to attend the queen’s speech by her messenger, Black Rod. When he arrives at the House chamber, the door is slammed in his face, symbolic of the right of Commons to admit no one except the queen’s messenger. It is then reopened so that Black Rod can deliver the summons. (No monarch has entered the House of Commons since 1642.)
      The queen delivered her message seated on her throne. She wore the regal robes and the royal platinum crown, studded with some 2,000 diamonds, including the 105-carat Koh-i-Noor.
      At the conclusion of her speech, the queen confirmed that she and the Duke of Edinburgh will visit Canada in June and travel to New York to visit the United Nations in July.
      Really drives home the idea of austerity, don’t you think?
******
      In many cultures the soul left the body temporarily in sleep; if it left permanently, the body would die. Thus it was important that the soul be induced to return from any absence. In some cases dreams are considered to be actual adventures of the soul while the body is asleep, as illustrated by the following:
      The Santals, a large tribe in India, told of a man who fell asleep, and his soul, in the form of a lizard, entered a pitcher for a drink of water. While the soul was inside, the owner of the pitcher covered it; consequently, the soul could not return, and the man died. While his friends were preparing to burn the body, someone uncovered the pitcher and the soul returned to the body, which immediately revived. He said he had been down in a well to get water, but had found it hard to get out.
      Man Takes Control – The Spirit Runs Through It.

The book and/or a free look inside is available in paperback or on Kindle at Amazon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Are Only Seven Jokes - Introduction

      The statement “There are only seven jokes – all the rest are variations,” has been around for a long time, but no one ever seems to know what the original seven are. I think I have found the solution to the mystery.       The answer is to be found in an article published in the New York Times on May 2, 1909. Entitled “New Jokes? There Are No New Jokes, There Is Only One Joke,” it goes on to say that all jokes are a distortion, and lists seven categories of distortion. Supposedly every joke will fit into one of the categories. I believe that repetition changed the seven categories into the seven jokes.       Each of my next seven blogs will be devoted to exploring one of the categories. In addition, I shall attempt to give an example or two of jokes which I think fit the category.       You must realize that this article appeared over one hundred years ago, so most of the jokes appearing therein are so out-of-date that modern readers wouldn’t even understand them. For example,

By Today’s Standards Many of my Teachers Would be in Jail

I started school in a two-room building: grades 1 to 4 in one room; grades 5 to 8 in the other. One teacher in each room taught all four grades. I don’t remember first grade very well – the teacher left at the end of the year. I am pretty sure it was not my fault. Now keep in mind that reading the Bible every morning was the standard for all grades at that time. But my teacher in grades two to four went a little above and beyond the normal practice. As a member of a “plain” sect, she considered it her duty to lead the little heathens to Christianity. She offered a free Bible to all students who managed to memorize 20 verses. I memorized my verses – “Jesus saves” was my favorite because it was the shortest – and got my Bible with my twenty underlined in red. That would be illegal today (not the underlining), and rightly so. Teachers may not teach religion, although contrary to what many folks seem to think, students may bring their Bibles to school, read them, and pray their
The National Anthem I have a somewhat minor pet peeve. I say minor because in the grand scheme of things neither I nor society will do anything substantive about it, so my best bet is probably to suck it up and move on. Perhaps after writing about it I can lay it to rest. It came up recently while I was working out at our Wellness Center. A program on television was playing America The Beautiful , and I remarked to a lady I have known for 40 years that I thought that should be the National Anthem instead of The Star Spangled Banner. She replied, rather huffily, I thought, “Some people think God Bless America should be the national anthem.” At that point I decided, wisely, I think, to back off before an argument sprang up. Now I realize that The Star Spangled Banner is a very nice, patriotic song, but an anthem it is not. According to Wikipedia, “ An anthem is a  musical composition  of celebration, usually used as a symbol for a distinct group, particularly the  nationa